7 Batumi projects under $60,000 for rental: where yield is higher and risk is lower

A budget of up to $60,000 covers a large part of Batumi's new-build investment market. In the current HomeRadar dataset, the most interesting rental scenarios in our comparison sit within this range.

Across the seven selected projects, modeled entry prices run from about $40,800 to $57,000, while modeled net yield ranges from 8% to 10%.

This highlights an important market feature: a more expensive apartment does not automatically mean higher yield or higher liquidity. The combination of purchase price, rental potential, occupancy, resale conditions and project readiness matters more.

For this article, we did not sort projects only by investment rating or by the highest modeled yield.

Comparison of seven projects

This is not a ranking from first to seventh place. The projects fit different scenarios. In one case the priority is to start renting without waiting for construction, in another the buyer is prepared to wait for the entry price or growth potential, and in a third liquidity matters more.

Arcon Batumi Residence: the most balanced profile

Arcon Batumi Residence looks like the most balanced option in this group.

The entry price is about $46,170, modeled yield is 9% and occupancy is 53%. Its investment rating of 79.2 is the highest among the selected projects.

The project scores 10 out of 10 for liquidity and 82.1 for exit potential. Its living rating is also relatively high at 84.

The building is completed, so there is no multi-year wait before it can be used.

This makes it one of the clearest choices for a buyer who wants a ready rental asset without a strong trade-off between yield and future resale.

Dar Tower: higher yield, weaker exit scenario

Dar Tower has a different profile.

The entry price is about $40,820, modeled yield is 10% and occupancy is 53%. The living rating reaches 90, the highest figure in the selected group.

Liquidity is only 5 out of 10, while the exit score is 33.8.

The trade-off is clear: the model shows an attractive rental profile, but a weaker resale scenario than Arcon or Avenue by Orbi.

The project is completed.

Dar Tower therefore makes more sense for a buyer who plans to hold the property and collect rental income rather than build the strategy around a quick resale.

Avenue by Orbi: lower yield, higher liquidity

Avenue by Orbi shows why maximum yield should not be the only filter.

The entry price is about $46,800, modeled yield is 8% and occupancy is 53%.

Liquidity is rated 9 out of 10 and the exit score is 71.9. That is stronger than many alternatives with a modeled yield of 10%.

The project is currently on sale.

Here the buyer gives up part of the modeled rental yield in exchange for a stronger liquidity profile.

Tekto Rakurs: 10% with stronger seasonality

Tekto Rakurs shows a modeled yield of 10% at an entry price of about $57,000.

This is the highest entry price among the seven selected projects and sits close to the article's $60,000 ceiling.

The main trade-off appears in occupancy. The model uses 42%, compared with 53% for Arcon, Avenue and Dar Tower.

Its capital appreciation score is 64, one of the highest in this group.

Tekto Rakurs is not completed yet.

That means its 10% figure should not be read in the same way as 10% for a completed project. Rental income can only begin after construction and unit preparation are finished.

Horizon Grand Residence: a future rental asset

Horizon Grand Residence is priced at about $51,470 and shows a modeled yield of 10%.

Occupancy is 47%, the investment rating is 72.7 and the living rating is 81.

The profile is fairly balanced, but the main risk factor is time.

The complex is under construction, so Horizon Grand Residence should be compared with other projects in development rather than with a completed apartment that can be rented today.

For the buyer, the key question is not only the modeled 10% yield but whether the entry price compensates for the waiting period without rental cash flow.

Prime Residence: a completed asset with more moderate yield

Prime Residence has a more conservative profile.

The entry price is about $50,400, modeled yield is 8% and occupancy is 48%. Liquidity is 7 out of 10 and the living rating is 79.

The project is completed.

This is a case where an investor accepts a lower modeled yield in exchange for a completed asset with no construction wait.

For a buyer who wants to see the apartment and assess the finished building before deciding, this scenario may be easier to understand than a project under construction with a higher modeled percentage.

Mardi Residence: high modeled yield, weaker living profile

Mardi Residence shows a modeled yield of 10% at an entry price of about $44,160.

Its profile differs from the more urban projects. Occupancy is 42%, while the living rating is 72, the lowest figure among the selected seven.

This reflects the trade-off of a more resort-oriented location: stronger modeled yield is paired with greater seasonality and a less universal owner-occupier scenario.

Mardi Residence makes more sense for a buyer who deliberately chooses the property primarily as a resort rental asset.

Which projects fit different scenarios

If you want a completed asset with the most balanced mix of modeled yield, liquidity and future resale potential, Arcon Batumi Residence looks strongest.

If modeled rental income is the priority and the property is intended to be held for a long time, Dar Tower looks more interesting, but its exit metrics are weaker.

Avenue by Orbi offers lower modeled yield but is noticeably stronger on liquidity.

Tekto Rakurs and Horizon Grand Residence suit buyers who are prepared to wait for construction to finish. The period without rental income needs to be considered separately.

Prime Residence is a more conservative completed option.

Mardi Residence looks more like a resort-rental strategy with greater seasonality.

How we calculated it

The investment model provides entry price, modeled net yield, occupancy, investment rating, liquidity, exit potential and capital appreciation. Living-level indicators are used as a second layer so the comparison reflects not only the rental model but also the quality of the property for actual living.

Projects were not sorted only by investment rating.

Construction stage, availability for purchase and risk were considered separately. Sold-out projects were not included in the main selection.

The numerical values in the article come from one HomeRadar data cut for comparability. Public project pages are updated independently and may already show newer ADR, occupancy, yield or another model version. We do not mix those values within the same comparison table.

Data cut: 6 October 2026.